Understanding the SaaS spend problem

How did SaaS spending get so out of control?

The shift from on-premise software to SaaS fundamentally changed software procurement, but most companies haven't adapted their management approaches:

Democratized purchasing: Traditional enterprise software required IT approval, procurement processes, and significant implementation. SaaS tools can be purchased with a credit card and deployed in minutes. This accessibility is powerful but creates visibility challenges.

Auto-renewal by default: SaaS subscriptions automatically renew unless actively canceled. This flips the traditional dynamic—instead of making conscious decisions to continue spending, you need conscious effort to stop spending. Inertia favors waste.

Usage invisibility: With on-premise software, IT could track installations and usage. With cloud SaaS, tracking who's actually using what requires integration with each platform's analytics—something most companies don't systematically implement.

Decentralized decision-making: Marketing picks their tools. Sales chooses their stack. Engineering selects development platforms. Product adopts their favorites. Nobody has a holistic view of what the company is paying for overall.

Rapid team changes: People leave. Roles change. Projects end. But the subscriptions they signed up for often persist, forgotten and unused but continuously billed.

The hidden costs beyond the subscription price

Direct subscription costs are just the visible portion of SaaS waste. Hidden costs compound the problem:

Integration complexity: Each new tool potentially requires integration with existing systems. Multiple overlapping tools create integration sprawl that's expensive to build and maintain.

Training overhead: Every tool requires learning. Duplicative tools mean teams invest time learning multiple systems that accomplish the same thing.

Security and compliance risk: Every SaaS tool is a potential security vulnerability and compliance challenge. More tools mean more risk surface area and more audit burden.

Decision fatigue: When teams have too many tools, they waste time deciding which to use for each task. This cognitive overhead reduces productivity.

Data fragmentation: Important information scattered across multiple tools makes analysis and reporting difficult. You're paying multiple vendors for creating your own data silo problem.

A company might think they're spending $10,000 annually on a tool, but when you account for integration, training, security review, and productivity impact, the true cost might be $25,000 or more.

Common patterns of SaaS waste

Understanding typical waste patterns helps identify where problems likely exist in your organization:

Zombie subscriptions: Tools that were useful once but are no longer needed. The employee who championed them left. The project ended. Usage evaporated. But nobody canceled the subscription.

Overlapping tools: Multiple teams independently purchasing tools that do similar things. Three project management platforms, four communication tools, five analytics solutions—all doing overlapping jobs.

Over-licensed seats: Bought licenses for 100 users when project kicked off. Now only 30 people use it regularly. But you're still paying for 100 seats because nobody reviewed and downsized.

Feature bloat: Paying for enterprise plans with advanced features nobody uses when basic plans would suffice. Often happens when sales pitches advanced features but actual usage remains simple.

Forgotten trials: Free trials that converted to paid subscriptions automatically. Nobody monitoring noticed. Months of payments for tools nobody remembers signing up for.

Auto-upgraded plans: Usage tiers that auto-upgrade when thresholds are exceeded. Suddenly you're paying 3x more because you crossed some usage boundary—perhaps legitimately, perhaps due to misuse or data issues.

Each pattern represents money walking out the door monthly, compounding into substantial annual waste.

How AI brings visibility to SaaS spending

Automated discovery: Finding shadow IT

The first challenge is simply knowing what software your company uses. Traditional approaches rely on finance systems to track approved software spending. But this misses shadow IT—tools purchased by individuals or teams without going through formal channels.

AI-powered SaaS management tools discover software spending across multiple sources:

Corporate card analysis: AI scans all corporate card transactions, identifying SaaS purchases even when merchants aren't obviously software vendors. Machine learning recognizes patterns—recurring monthly charges, known SaaS company names, merchant category codes associated with software.

Email integration: Many SaaS subscriptions generate confirmation emails, renewal notices, and receipts. AI scans company email (with appropriate permissions) to identify software subscriptions, even personal licenses paid for with corporate cards.

Browser extension tracking: Some AI systems offer browser extensions that detect which SaaS applications employees access, creating comprehensive usage maps automatically without requiring manual reporting.

Accounting system integration: AI connects to accounting platforms to identify all software-related expenses, categorize them intelligently, and associate them with specific tools.

SSO and identity platform analysis: For companies using single sign-on, AI can analyze authentication logs to see which applications employees access, providing usage data automatically.

The result? A comprehensive inventory of every SaaS tool your company pays for, including shadow IT that finance never knew existed. Most companies discover 30-50% more software subscriptions than they knew about through automated discovery.

Intelligent categorization and Normalization

Once AI discovers all software spending, it needs to make sense of it. This requires intelligent categorization:

Vendor normalization: Credit card statements might show "SLACK TECH" one month, "Slack Technologies" another, and "Slack.com" a third time. AI recognizes these as the same vendor and consolidates spending accordingly.

Product identification: Same vendor, multiple products—Adobe has dozens. AI distinguishes between Creative Cloud, Document Cloud, Experience Cloud, and other Adobe products even when merchant names are similar.

Category classification: AI categorizes software into meaningful groups—communication, project management, analytics, development tools, marketing, sales, HR, etc. This enables analysis by category to find overlap and optimization opportunities.

License type detection: Annual versus monthly. Per-seat versus usage-based. Free trials versus paid. Enterprise versus standard. AI extracts and categorizes these details automatically from transaction patterns and documentation.

This intelligent organization transforms raw transaction data into actionable insights about software portfolio.

Real-time spend tracking

Traditional expense tracking operates on delays—you see spending after month-end close. AI-powered systems provide real-time visibility:

Immediate transaction processing: New software purchases appear in dashboards within hours or days, not weeks.

Renewal alerts: AI tracks renewal dates and alerts teams weeks in advance, creating opportunities to review before auto-renewal kicks in.

Spending trend analysis: Real-time spending data shows trends as they develop—is software spending accelerating? Which categories are growing fastest? Are there unusual spikes?

Budget tracking: See actual spend against software budgets continuously, not just at month-end. This enables proactive management instead of reactive variance analysis.

This real-time visibility transforms software spend from a retrospective accounting exercise to a proactive management discipline.

AI-powered usage analysis: Who's actually using what?

Connecting spending to usage data

Knowing what you pay for is step one. Understanding whether you're getting value is step two. AI systems connect spending data with usage data to reveal underutilized subscriptions:

API integration: Many SaaS platforms provide APIs that report usage statistics—active users, login frequency, feature utilization. AI automatically connects to these APIs and imports usage data.

SSO analytics: For companies using single sign-on, authentication logs show who's logging into which applications and how frequently. This provides usage proxy even for tools without robust APIs.

Activity pattern analysis: AI doesn't just count logins—it analyzes usage patterns. Someone logging in once monthly to check something is different from someone using the tool daily for core work. AI distinguishes engaged users from nominal users.

Feature utilization tracking: For tools with feature-level APIs, AI tracks which features get used. You might have 100 licenses for a platform but discover 80% of users only use basic features available in cheaper plans.

Identifying underutilized licenses

The most common source of SaaS waste is paying for licenses nobody uses. AI detects this through sophisticated analysis:

Active usage thresholds: AI establishes baseline "active usage" definitions for each tool type. Someone who logged in once in three months isn't an active user worth paying for.

Usage percentiles: AI shows usage distribution—perhaps 20% of licensed users generate 80% of activity. The bottom quartile might be candidates for license removal.

Dormant accounts: Licenses assigned to former employees or people who've moved to roles where the tool isn't relevant. AI cross-references user databases with HR systems to identify stale accounts.

Seasonal patterns: Some usage is legitimately seasonal. AI distinguishes temporary low usage from permanent non-use, avoiding false positives during naturally slow periods.

According to Brex, about one-third of SaaS spending goes to underutilized or unused subscriptions. AI identifies exactly which licenses fall into this category, enabling targeted optimization.

Detecting duplicate and Overlapping tools

Beyond unused licenses, significant waste comes from redundant tools. AI detects overlap through multiple signals:

Category analysis: Multiple tools in the same category (project management, communication, etc.) suggest potential redundancy. AI flags these for review.

Usage correlation: If the same users are actively using multiple similar tools, there's likely overlap. AI identifies these patterns—perhaps engineers use both Jira and Asana, suggesting redundancy.

Feature comparison: AI can compare tool feature sets (using public documentation and API data) to identify significant overlap. Two tools both offering task management, time tracking, and collaboration might be duplicative.

Integration maps: Tools that integrate with each other suggest related functionality. AI maps integration relationships to understand the tool ecosystem and spot redundancies.

Team surveys: AI-powered surveys can ask teams about their tool usage, pain points, and perceptions of overlap. Natural language processing analyzes responses to identify optimization opportunities.

Many companies discover they're paying for 3-4 tools doing substantially similar things across different teams—each team preferring their choice but collectively creating massive waste.

AI-driven optimization recommendations

License right-sizing

Once AI identifies underutilized licenses, it provides specific optimization recommendations:

Removal candidates: List of specific users whose usage patterns suggest they don't need licenses. "These 15 users haven't logged in for 90+ days. Consider removing licenses to save $X monthly."

Downgrade opportunities: Users who only use basic features despite having premium licenses. "These 20 users only use features available in basic plans. Downgrade to save $Y monthly."

Consolidation options: When multiple small subscriptions exist, bulk licensing might be cheaper. "Your current 5 separate accounts total $500/month. A single enterprise plan for 50 users costs $400/month."

Seasonal adjustments: For tools with usage seasonality, recommendations about scaling licenses up and down with demand. "License additional seats in Q4 (your busy season), remove them Q1-Q3 to optimize costs."

These aren't vague suggestions—AI provides specific user lists, cost calculations, and implementation steps.

Plan optimization

Beyond license counts, plan structures significantly impact costs. AI analyzes whether your current plans are optimal:

Tier analysis: Compare your usage against tier thresholds. Perhaps you're paying for mid-tier but only using features available in basic tier. Or you're constantly hitting limits that would justify upgrading to unlimited tier.

Usage-based vs. seat-based: Some tools offer both models. AI calculates which is cheaper given your actual usage patterns. Might be cheaper to pay per-use than maintain seat licenses for occasional users.

Annual vs. monthly: Annual contracts typically offer discounts but reduce flexibility. AI weighs discount value against likelihood you'll need to change plans, recommending optimal commitment length.

Add-on analysis: You might pay separately for features that would be cheaper bundled. Or pay for bundled features you never use when a la carte would cost less. AI identifies these optimization opportunities.

One company using AI optimization discovered they could downgrade 40% of their Slack licenses from paid to free (for users who rarely used advanced features) and upgrade their main account to Enterprise Grid (unlocking features they were trying to recreate with other tools), netting 25% overall cost reduction while improving functionality.

Consolidation strategies

When AI identifies redundant tools, it provides consolidation roadmaps:

Migration planning: Step-by-step guides for migrating from Tool A to Tool B—data export, import, user training, timeline recommendations.

Cost-benefit analysis: Precise calculation of savings from consolidation versus migration costs and change management burden. Not all consolidation makes financial sense.

Feature gap identification: What functionality might you lose by consolidating? AI identifies gaps and suggests workarounds or compensating solutions.

Adoption strategies: Recommendations for driving adoption of consolidated tools—training, champions, incentives—based on change management best practices.

One enterprise consolidated from five project management tools to one, saving $85,000 annually. AI didn't just identify the opportunity—it provided the complete migration playbook.

Negotiation intelligence

AI provides powerful leverage for vendor negotiations:

Market rate analysis: AI knows what other companies pay for similar tools at similar scale. This provides benchmarking data for negotiations: "Companies your size typically pay X for this tool; you're paying Y."

Competitive alternatives: AI identifies comparable tools and their pricing, giving you alternatives to reference during negotiations: "Competitor Z offers similar functionality for 30% less."

Usage-based leverage: Your actual usage data creates negotiation power. If you're paying for 100 seats but only 60 are active, you have concrete data supporting lower pricing or license counts.

Renewal timing optimization: AI tracks renewal dates across your portfolio, identifying opportunities to bundle renewals for volume discounts or time contract expirations to negotiate from stronger positions.

Contract term analysis: AI reviews your existing contracts to identify early termination clauses, price escalation terms, and other provisions that inform negotiation strategy.

Companies using AI-driven negotiation intelligence report 15-30% cost reductions on renewals compared to accepting vendor-proposed terms.

Implementing AI-powered SaaS management

Getting started: Quick wins

You don't need perfect implementation to start capturing value. Begin with quick wins:

Week 1 - Discovery: Deploy AI tool to scan corporate cards and email for software subscriptions. Most companies discover 30-50% more subscriptions than they knew existed within the first week.

Week 2 - Low-hanging fruit: Identify and cancel obvious waste—forgotten trials, accounts for former employees, clear duplicates. This often saves 5-10% of software spending immediately.

Week 3 - Usage integration: Connect AI to SSO or major platform APIs to start gathering usage data. Even partial usage visibility reveals optimization opportunities.

Week 4 - Initial optimization: Based on usage data, make first round of optimization—remove unused licenses, downgrade underutilized accounts, consolidate obvious duplicates.

Most companies save enough in the first month to cover annual AI tool costs, making ROI immediate.

Establishing governance

Sustained SaaS optimization requires governance, not just one-time cleanup:

Approval workflows: Require finance or IT review for new software purchases above a threshold. AI tools can trigger these workflows automatically when new subscriptions are detected.

Regular reviews: Monthly or quarterly reviews of software portfolio—usage trends, spending changes, optimization opportunities. AI generates review agendas automatically.

Ownership assignment: Every tool should have an owner responsible for justifying its value and managing its usage. AI helps identify orphaned tools without clear owners.

Budget allocation: Assign software budgets by department with visibility into actual spending. AI provides dashboards showing budget vs. actual in real-time.

Renewal processes: Systematic review of every subscription before renewal—is it still needed? Is usage strong? Can we negotiate better terms? AI triggers reviews at appropriate times.

These governance practices prevent waste from accumulating again after initial cleanup.

Integration with procurement

AI SaaS management works best integrated into procurement workflows:

Pre-purchase analysis: Before approving new software, check whether existing tools provide similar functionality. AI can automatically search your current portfolio and suggest alternatives.

Consolidated purchasing: Rather than individuals buying subscriptions ad hoc, channel purchases through procurement for volume discounts and consolidated management.

Vendor relationship management: Track all relationships with each vendor across products. Sometimes consolidating multiple products with one vendor creates leverage for better overall pricing.

Contract repository: Maintain all software contracts in searchable repository. AI can extract key terms—renewal dates, pricing, termination clauses—making contract data actionable.

Change management for software consolidation

Technology solutions only work if people adopt them. Consolidating software requires thoughtful change management:

Communicate benefits: Explain why consolidation helps—not just cost savings but reduced tool sprawl, better integration, simpler workflows.

Involve users: Teams using redundant tools helped select them initially and have opinions. Include them in consolidation decisions to build buy-in.

Provide training: Migrating to new tools requires learning. Invest in training to ensure smooth transitions rather than frustrated users finding workarounds.

Allow transition time: Don't cut off old tools immediately after migration. Overlap periods let users transition at comfortable pace while ensuring you eventually cancel redundant subscriptions.

Measure adoption: Track usage of consolidated tools to ensure adoption is actually happening, not just tool switching without usage improvement.

One company learned this lesson the hard way—they consolidated project management tools without adequate training or transition time. Teams revolted, productivity dropped, and within three months they'd recreated tool sprawl with shadow IT purchases. Second attempt with proper change management succeeded.

Industry-specific SaaS optimization strategies

Startups and scale-ups: Managing growth-driven sprawl

Fast-growing companies face unique SaaS challenges:

Rapid team scaling: Headcount doubling annually creates constant license management needs. What was right-sized last quarter is over-provisioned this quarter as roles shift.

Experimentation culture: Startups try tools quickly, keeping some, abandoning others. This creates accumulation of forgotten subscriptions unless actively managed.

Credit card proliferation: Early-stage companies often have multiple team members with corporate cards, each making independent software purchases.

Optimization strategy: Monthly reviews of software portfolio, aggressive cleanup of unused tools, consolidation focused on category leaders likely to scale with company, and strong approval workflows for new purchases.

AI particularly helps startups by providing enterprise-level visibility and control without enterprise-level finance team resources.

Enterprise: Managing complexity at scale

Large organizations face different challenges:

Departmental autonomy: Divisions operate independently, each building their own software stacks with significant duplication across the organization.

Legacy systems: Long-term contracts, custom integrations, and organizational inertia make consolidation more complex than startups face.

Compliance requirements: Enterprise software often involves security reviews, compliance assessments, and legal contract negotiations that complicate both purchasing and consolidation.

Optimization strategy: Enterprise-wide visibility despite departmental autonomy, center-led guidelines with execution flexibility, strategic vendor relationships consolidated at corporate level for volume pricing, and phased consolidation respecting integration complexity.

AI helps enterprises by aggregating visibility across complex organizational structures and identifying optimization opportunities that respect compliance and integration constraints.

Remote-first companies: Distributed tool management

Remote and hybrid organizations face unique visibility challenges:

Geographic distribution: Teams in different regions may use region-specific tools or vendors, creating additional portfolio complexity.

Autonomous team purchasing: Without physical offices concentrating tool decisions, remote teams operate more independently, potentially increasing tool proliferation.

Collaboration tool explosion: Remote work drives communication and collaboration tool adoption. Companies might have multiple video conferencing, chat, and collaboration platforms across different teams.

Optimization strategy: Strong central visibility despite geographic distribution, standardization on core collaboration stack while allowing flexibility for specialized tools, and regional considerations for tools with geographic pricing variation.

AI particularly helps remote companies by providing centralized visibility that would otherwise require coordinating across distributed teams.

Measuring SaaS optimization success

Key performance indicators

Track these metrics to measure optimization program effectiveness:

Total SaaS spend: Overall software spending trend—should decrease or grow slower than headcount/revenue after optimization.

Spend per employee: Software cost normalized by employee count provides scale-adjusted comparison over time.

Utilization rates: Percentage of licensed seats actually used actively. Target 85%+ utilization for most tools.

Number of tools: Raw count of distinct software tools. More isn't always worse, but trend matters—is proliferation accelerating or moderating?

Duplicate tools: Number of tool categories where you have multiple options. Should decrease through consolidation.

Contract optimization rate: Percentage of renewals where you negotiated better terms versus accepting vendor proposals.

Time to detect new subscriptions: How quickly does new software spending appear in visibility tools? Should be days, not months.

Zombie subscription rate: Percentage of subscriptions with zero or minimal usage. Target under 5%.

ROI calculation

Quantify optimization program value:

Direct savings: Sum of canceled subscriptions, downgraded licenses, negotiated discounts, and consolidation savings.

Avoided costs: Future spending prevented through approval workflows and negotiation—harder to measure but valuable.

Efficiency gains: Time saved by teams using consolidated tools versus managing multiple solutions—qualitative but real.

Risk reduction: Value of reduced security surface area and compliance burden from fewer tools—difficult to quantify precisely but substantial.

Most companies report ROI of 5-10x on SaaS optimization tools—spend $50K annually on management platform, save $250-500K in wasted software spending.

Continuous improvement

SaaS optimization isn't one-time cleanup—it's ongoing discipline:

Monthly reviews: Quick checks of new subscriptions, usage trends, renewal opportunities. Should take 30-60 minutes monthly with AI-generated dashboards.

Quarterly deep dives: Comprehensive portfolio reviews—category analysis, consolidation opportunities, contract negotiations. Half-day quarterly exercise.

Annual strategy: Holistic review of software strategy—which tools are strategic multi-year investments versus tactical temporary solutions? What consolidation opportunities exist across the portfolio? Full-day annual planning.

AI makes continuous optimization feasible by automating discovery, analysis, and recommendation generation. What would take weeks manually happens automatically.

Common challenges and solutions

"We can't remove licenses without upsetting teams"

Many CFOs worry about team pushback when removing access to tools, even underutilized ones.

Solution: Data-driven conversations. Rather than "we're cutting your tools to save money," show actual usage data: "This tool has 20 licenses but only 5 people logged in during the past 3 months. Can we move to 10 licenses and add back if needed?"

Usage data depersonalizes the conversation. Most teams agree to right-sizing when shown concrete evidence of non-use.

"Our contracts make consolidation expensive"

Long-term contracts with termination penalties can make consolidation seem prohibitively expensive.

Solution: Calculate total cost of ownership over contract lifetime versus continuing dual systems. Often the consolidation savings over remaining contract term exceeds termination fees.

Also negotiate. Vendors often waive termination fees if you're consolidating onto another product they offer or switching to a competitor willing to buy you out.

"We don't have resources to manage this"

Small finance teams feel overwhelmed by software portfolio management complexity.

Solution: AI automation dramatically reduces management burden. What previously took 20 hours monthly for manual tracking and analysis now takes 2 hours with AI-generated reports and recommendations.

Also, optimize high-value opportunities first. Don't try to optimize every $50/month subscription—focus on subscriptions over $500/month where impact justifies effort.

"Teams will just find workarounds"

If you restrict software purchasing too much, teams might use personal credit cards or free tier tools that create other problems.

Solution: Balance control with enablement. Make approved tool purchasing frictionless while requiring review for new categories. Provide consolidated tools that genuinely meet team needs rather than forcing suboptimal solutions in the name of cost savings.

Best SaaS governance empowers teams within guardrails, not blocks them entirely.

The future of AI-powered SaaS management

Predictive optimization

Current AI largely operates reactively—identifying waste after it exists. Future AI will predict waste before it happens:

Usage prediction: Based on role, team, and historical patterns, AI will predict whether new license requests are likely to be used heavily or become waste.

Renewal predictions: AI will predict which renewals are likely to continue versus which subscriptions are losing relevance based on usage trend analysis.

Consolidation opportunity detection: As new tools are added, AI will proactively flag potential overlap with existing tools before purchasing.

Automated optimization actions

Beyond recommendations, future AI will execute optimizations automatically with appropriate controls:

Auto-downgrading: Automatically move underutilized users to cheaper plans while maintaining access.

Seasonal license scaling: Automatically add licenses during busy seasons, remove during slow periods based on learned usage patterns.

Negotiation automation: AI negotiating with vendor AI systems for optimal pricing based on usage data and market rates.

Integration intelligence

AI will optimize not just individual tools but entire software ecosystems:

Integration mapping: Understanding which tools must work together and optimizing for integration efficiency, not just individual tool cost.

Workflow optimization: Recommending tool combinations that create efficient workflows versus technically cheaper options that create workflow friction.

Data flow analysis: Ensuring consolidated tool stacks maintain necessary data flows and don't create information silos.

Your 1questions about SaaS optimization, answered

"How much can we realistically save through SaaS optimization?"

Most companies save 20-35% of software spending through comprehensive optimization—in line with Brex's finding that about one-third of spend is wasted. Actual savings depend on current waste levels and optimization discipline.

"How long does SaaS optimization take?"

Initial discovery and low-hanging fruit savings happen in weeks. Comprehensive optimization with consolidation takes 3-6 months. Ongoing optimization is continuous with monthly check-ins.

"Will removing licenses hurt productivity?"

Removing truly unused licenses doesn't hurt productivity—those users weren't using the tools anyway. Risk comes from removing licenses from users who use them, which data-driven approaches avoid. Consolidation requires change management but often improves productivity by reducing tool sprawl.

"What's the ROI on SaaS management tools?"

Most companies report 5-10x ROI—spend $50K annually on management platform, save $250-500K in wasted subscriptions. ROI is usually immediate, with first month's savings covering annual tool costs.

"Do we need dedicated resources for SaaS management?"

AI automation means most companies can manage SaaS optimization with 5-10 hours monthly from finance team members, not full-time dedicated resources. Larger enterprises might justify dedicated roles, but it's not required for most.

"How do we handle teams that insist they need specific tools?"

Data-driven conversations work best. If usage data shows genuine heavy use, accommodate team preferences. If data shows minimal use, teams usually agree to alternatives when shown evidence. Balance standardization with legitimate team needs.

"What about free trials and freemium tools?"

AI tools can track free tier usage and flag when you're paying for features available free elsewhere. Freemium tools are fine for light use but watch for auto-upgrades to paid tiers without review.

Taking action: Your SaaS optimization roadmap

Immediate steps (This week)

Run quick audit: Manually review credit card statements from past 3 months. List all software subscriptions you can identify. Most companies are shocked by what they find even in quick manual review.

Identify obvious waste: From your manual list, flag obvious waste—forgotten trials now paid, subscriptions for former employees, clear duplicates across teams.

Calculate baseline: Add up total monthly software spending you've identified. This baseline lets you measure optimization impact.

Research AI tools: Survey SaaS management platforms. Many offer free trials. See which approaches align with your needs and scale.

Short-term implementation (Next 30 days)

Deploy AI discovery: Implement AI-powered SaaS management tool. Let it run comprehensive discovery across cards, email, and accounting systems.

Execute quick wins: Cancel obvious waste identified in discovery. This often saves 5-10% immediately.

Establish governance: Create approval workflow for new software purchases above a threshold. Define who reviews and approves based on amount and category.

Integrate usage data: Connect AI tool to SSO or major platform APIs to start gathering usage analytics.

Long-term optimization (Next 3-6 months)

Usage-based optimization: With usage data flowing, identify underutilized licenses and execute right-sizing.

Consolidation planning: For tools with clear overlap, develop consolidation roadmap with migration timeline and change management plan.

Contract optimization: As renewals approach, use AI insights and market data to negotiate better terms.

Establish rhythms: Monthly quick checks, quarterly deep dives, annual strategy review. Make SaaS optimization continuous discipline.

The bottom line: Stop wasting money on software nobody uses

SaaS has transformed how companies use software, but management practices haven't kept pace. The result? Companies waste about one-third of software spending on unused licenses, forgotten subscriptions, and redundant tools—according to Brex.

For a company spending $500K annually on software, that's $165K per year literally vanishing. Scale that to millions in software spend, and waste becomes staggering.

Traditional approaches—manual tracking, periodic audits, spreadsheet management—simply can't keep pace with SaaS proliferation. AI-powered SaaS optimization finally provides tools equal to the challenge: automated discovery of all subscriptions including shadow IT, usage analysis showing what's actually used, intelligent recommendations for consolidation and optimization, and real-time visibility that makes continuous optimization feasible.

The companies that implement AI-driven SaaS management stop wasting tens or hundreds of thousands annually on software nobody uses. They negotiate better contracts with data-driven leverage. They consolidate tool sprawl into efficient, integrated stacks. They make software spending visible, managed, and optimized.

Your competitors are implementing these systems. Your software spending is almost certainly harboring waste. The question isn't whether optimization delivers value—it clearly does. The question is how much longer you'll let 30% of your software budget evaporate before taking action.

How much is your company wasting on unused software right now?

‍